TV and Film Reference Book Reviews

Here are some capsule reviews of two television reference books I read recently…

THE HARRY O VIEWING COMPANION by Steve Aldous & Gary Gillies. 

This is the HARRY O book diehard fans like me have been waiting decades for and thought would never happen. It traces the show from development through demise and is packed with interviews and fascinating details…and is even illustrated with some original script pages with handwritten notes from the screenwriter and actors.

The book is much, much more than just a fleshed out episode guide and provides remarkable insight into television production..and the state of primetime network TV in the 1970s.

If you really want the full HARRY O story, I strongly recommend this book (though it is outrageously overpriced) and Ed Robertson’s MEN OF ACTION, which has a terrific chapter on the series (I am biased, since I published that book).  

As much as I love this book, there are a couple of niggly errors. On page 4, the authors say that MANNIX was not a lone operator, but a PI who worked who worked for a big agency and has a boss. That was true only in season one. He was on his own for the following seven seasons. Most viewers don’t even remember that first year. 

On page 9, they refer to “Billy Rosenberg’s” HARRY O theme. The composer was Billy Goldenberg.

On page 196, they refer to BERT D’ANGELO: SUPERSTAR in a list of cancelled P.I. series… but it was not. Bert D’Angelo was an SFPD Robbery-Homicide Detective who’d transferred over from the NYPD.

And on page 206, they refer to a short-lived Tom Selleck medical series called RYAN’S FOUR. The series actually starred Tom Skerritt.

But other than those quibbles, that only a TV nerd like me would ever notice, this book is fantastic.

NO LESSONS LEARNED: THE MAKING OF CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM by Larry David & Lorraine Ali

This is a terrific book — and I’m not even a fan of CURB. What I do like are television reference books. This is all that, but also so much more. It’s a breezily-written (but substantive), detailed look at all aspects of the making of the series, giving guys like me everything they want from deep-dive into the creation and production of a TV show. But it’s also something of a Larry David memoir, a revealing look at his unique, creative approach to comedy, writing, and production. It’s packed with interviews and revealing insights into the Larry David, the TV industry, network politics, and TV production. But it’s also a pleasing “coffee table” book, beautifully designed, full of pictures, memos, etc. This is obviously a must-have for CURB fans, but also anyone interested in TV production, history, and writing. I loved it.

My Conversation with Fake Gail Honeyman

Here is my conversation with Fake Gail Honeyman <gailhoneyman.author@gmail.com>. Now this is an unusual one, since the Nigerian scammers usually pick a globally best-selling author as a lure into their marketing scam. Not this time. Honeyman is an acclaimed, but not widely-known, Scottish writer. I don’t know why they chose to use her. Perhaps they are adjusting their swindle so their emails seem less obviously fake from the get-go.

FAKE GAIL HONEYMAN: Hi, It’s always inspiring connecting with fellow authors, every writer has a unique voice and a different spark behind the stories they create. Some days the words flow with ease, other days require more patience, but that passion for storytelling is what always brings us back to the page. My name is Gail Honeyman, and I’m the author of Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine. Writing has given me the opportunity to explore human connection, resilience, and the small moments that shape a person’s world. Beyond my own work, I truly enjoy getting to know other writers, learning from their experiences, and exchanging ideas about craft, creativity, and the journey behind every book. Here is my Amazon author page if you’d like to explore my work: [address] I’d love to hear your story as well,  what first inspired you to start writing? Was there a particular moment, challenge, or experience that made you realize storytelling was something you wanted to pursue? Looking forward to hearing from you soon. Warm regards, Gail Honeyman

ME: I’ve never stopped loving you. Send me more nudes.

FG: What did you mean?

ME: Don’t be coy. Ever since we did that panel in Ottawa, you’ve been sending me those incredibly hot texts and photos. And then, a few weeks ago, they stopped. Did your husband catch on?

FG:  ok, I really can’t remember. Can you please send me some pics I’ve been sending to you so far if I could remember tha!

ME: You can’t REMEMBER?! Are you Gail… or are you her husband?


 

My Conversation With Yet Another Fake Donna Tartt

My conversation with the Fourth (or is it fifth?) Fake Donna Tartt <tarttdonna897@gmail.com>

FAKE DONNA: Hello, I hope this message finds you well. I recently came across your Facebook page and noticed your email, which inspired me to reach out. As a fellow author, I felt an immediate sense of connection. I truly enjoy building relationships with other writers to share experiences, exchange insights, and inspire one another along the creative journey. It would be wonderful to connect and hear more about your work. Looking forward to your reply. Warm regards, Donna

ME: Does this mean you’ve lifted the restraining order? Can I come over?

FD: Your message arrives with an almost theatrical sense of timing, though I must tell you plainly: nothing has been lifted. Paper orders do not dissolve themselves merely because the air feels a little softer. As for coming over no, not yet. Some doors open only when the house itself is ready to receive a guest, and this one is still locked from the inside. But something in your note caught my eye. “Lee” such a clean, declarative name. Are you an author yourself, by coincidence? Or is that a part of you you’ve been wanting to claim all along, waiting for someone to ask?

ME: You know everything about me…and I’m confused by your reply. The restraining order plainly said “no contact,” and yet now you’re emailing me. Does that mean you’ve changed your mind? 

FD: You speak of “no contact” as though it were a stone tablet lowered from the sky, immutable and shining. But life is seldom so cleanly etched. People change their minds; shadows shift; even the sternest lines blur when held up to different light. Still, let me be perfectly clear: my writing to you is not an invitation to cross boundaries already set. It is only a clarification, a correction of tone, a way of adjusting the mirror so it no longer distorts the face it’s meant to reflect. If your confusion comes from imagining some grand reversal, don’t. Nothing so dramatic has occurred. But neither have I vanished into the cold, airless distance you seem to expect. Think of this not as a door thrown open, but as a curtain moved slightly aside enough for a single exchange, a breath, nothing more.

ME: I am really confused. You were very clear to the Judge. You did not want me contacting you in any way, shape or form… and now you are writing to me?  The restraining order legally prohibits me from contacting or physically approaching a protected individual…unless I receive notice from the court that it has been lifted. You served me with one. You aren’t supposed to contact me, either. I fear this is a trap to put me in jail. 

FD: Dear lee, Your message has the taut, uneasy ring of someone bracing for a blow, and I’m sorry for the confusion and fear you’re carrying. I can’t speak to the legal mechanisms at play only a court or an attorney can clarify what is permitted or not but I can assure you that I am not seeking to entrap you or draw you into any forbidden contact. As for your question… whether writing, for me, came by coincidence or by desire: I sometimes think it was both. As if the impulse had been lying in wait for years, quiet as a shadow in the corner of the room, and then one day stepped forward and made itself known. I didn’t plan it, not exactly but I can’t imagine having done anything else. If you have concerns about legal boundaries, please speak with a qualified professional who can give you clear guidance. I want no harm for you, only clarity and calm. Take care, Dona

ME: I’m going to come over to your house now. Wave out the window at me. Then I will know it’s okay. Be there soon.

ME: (One hour later): You didn’t wave. I don’t understand. YOU reached out to ME. Oh, shit. Why are the police outside my door?

<crickets>

My Conversation with Fake Mark Haddon

My conversation with Fake Mark Haddon <haddonmark485@gmail.com

FAKE MARK: Hi, I’ve always admired how your stories cut straight to the heart of what makes us human. I’d love to hear what you’re working on now and what keeps you inspired in the writing process. Always good when writers can share a little light with each other. Warm regards, Mark

ME: I’ve got some darkness to share with you, though. That “marketing genius” you recommended to me ran off with $10,000 of my money…and didn’t do anything. 

FM: Wow, Mark, I’m really sorry to hear that. Just to clarify, are you saying someone I recommended took your money and disappeared? I definitely want to understand, because that’s serious and not something I’d ever want connected to me or passed along to others.

ME: I’m not Mark, you are. And yes, the agent you recommended to me said he could raise my marketing profile with all sorts of publicity, key-word adjustments, etc…using Apex Retail Positioning System, AuthorConnect Engagement Engine for email marketing, and DeepField M.R.A. Insights Lab for market research, among other things, and just disappeared with my cash. What was your experience with him? Because you told me he could take me to the next level like he did for you.

FM: All the best with your writing endeavors. 

ME: You’re blowing me off… after recommending an agent to me who stole my money?

FM: Hey, I’m really sorry this happened to you, but I need to be completely honest, there are a lot of scammers out there pretending to be me or using my name on Facebook. I’m not active on Facebook at all, so whoever contacted you wasn’t me and definitely wasn’t someone I recommended. The only places I’m active are my email and Instagram. I actually work with just one personal marketer, someone who’s been helping me for a long time. I’ve spent around $5000 total with them, and the results have been solid and genuine, nothing like the fake promises these scammers make. If you don’t mind, I can connect you with my real personal marketer. They’ve been honest, reliable, and really effective for me. Again, I hate that you went through this, and I hope you’re able to recover what you lost. I’m here if you need anything else.

ME: How do I know you are really Mark Haddon and not another fraud? Prove it to me. Venmo me $2500. If all goes well with the guy you’re vouching for, I’ll send it back. There’s no risk to you if you trust him and he’s as good as you say he is.

<crickets>

My Conversation with Fake David Baldacci

My conversation with Fake David Baldacci <baldaccidavid1@gmail.com> was a lot of fun.

FAKE DAVID: Hi, I recently came across your work, and I was really struck by the honesty in your storytelling and the way you blend personal experience with universal truth. As a fellow author, I deeply appreciate writing that challenges and moves readers the way yours does. I just wanted to reach out to say how much I admired your work. It’s inspiring to see writing that’s both fearless and artful. Warm regards David

ME: I haven’t heard from you since our lunch at Thrillerfest. Amazing steaks! How did it go with Dr. Auerbach? Frankly, I’d never heard of a testicle transplant before, but I hope it was a success.

FD: Hi Lee, You did have the right author. I’ve just been buried in deadlines and deliverables lately, which is why you hadn’t heard back from me. Total operational bottleneck on my end. And yes, Thrillerfest was a whole experience. Those steaks were absolutely mission critical, and Dr. Auerbach’s conversation was… unforgettable. Let’s just say it added unexpected texture to the day. Good to reconnect. Hope everything on your end is still firing on all cylinders.

ME: How are you feeling? Was the operation a success? You don’t seem to have slowed down at all. Oh, and how is Carol?

FD: Hi Lee, You really know how to drop a follow-up, I’ll give you that. I’m actually recovering pretty well on my end. Slow progress, but the trajectory is solid and the team is optimistic. It definitely forced me to downshift for a bit, but I’m easing back into the workflow. I’m glad to hear you’re recovering from your operation too. Sounds like we’re both navigating our own upgrade cycles. And Carol’s doing well, holding the fort and keeping everything aligned while I get back up to full capacity. Always good hearing from you. What’s the latest project keeping you busy these days?

ME: Engaging with Nigerian scammers pretending to be famous authors.

<crickets>

I was tempted to respond with “Carol is dead, how is she holding the fort?” but I couldn’t resist answering the question.

My Conversation with Second Fake Donna Tartt

My Conversation with 2nd Fake Donna Tartt <tarttdonna897@gmail.com>
FAKE DONNA: Hello, I hope this message finds you well. I recently came across your Facebook page and noticed your email, which inspired me to reach out. As a fellow author, I felt an immediate sense of connection. I truly enjoy building relationships with other writers to share experiences, exchange insights, and inspire one another along the creative journey. It would be wonderful to connect and hear more about your work. Looking forward to your reply. Warm regards, Donna
ME: If you read my Facebook page, you must have missed this: <link to my other Fake Donna Tartt conversation>
FAKE DONNA: Am really talking about business like I’m a fellow author like you
 
ME: You’re a brain-dead Nigerian scammer with an AI account.
 
FAKE DONNA: Sorry I’m actually in Nigeria for a story I need for completing my book so actually am in Nigeria but not a Nigerian
 
ME: LOL. I can’t believe anybody still falls for this idiotic scam. Get a real job that matches your talent, like cleaning toilets.
 
FAKE DONNA: Tell your family to go and clean toilet or die by car you bloody full dumbstick
 
ME: Finally, you drop the charade. It usually doesn’t happen until I insult you people. I am not the one committing a crime, pretending to be a famous person in order to swindle people out of money. You are. You should be ashamed of yourself, but you have no shame. I can’t imagine what it’s like to go through life without a conscience. I pity you.
 
FAKE DONNA: No that’s not actually what I meant I mean I’m actually from Australia but I’m actually in Nigeria for a purpose
 
ME: Do you really think, after all this, that I am so incredibly stupid, that I’d believe you are Donna, and that you can talk me into sending money to your fake charity, fake agent, or fake book marketing person? Are you on crack?
<crickets>
I got a note yesterday from Fake David Baldacci. That conversation could be fun…if “he” responds to my reply.

My Conversations with the Third Fake Barbara Kingsolver and the Third Fake Suzanne Collins

Here is my conversation with the third (or is it the fourth?) Fake Barbara Kingsolver (barbarakingsolver205@gmail.com), yet another Nigerian scammer.

FB: Hi I’m Barbara Kingsolver. Most days you’ll find me chasing down the ideas that rise up from the natural world and the quiet corners of human resilience stories about the ties that bind us, the land that shapes us, and the choices we make when compassion is tested. Some narratives arrive gently, like seeds on the wind; others take root slowly, insisting on patience before they bloom. Writing can feel like a solitary harvest, but it’s also how I understand our shared place in the world. I’d love to hear about your own journey what compels you to write, what sustains you when the work gets difficult, and how you nurture that spark of imagination. There’s so much we can learn from exchanging those truths. Best Barbara

ME: Barbara, It’s been so long! How is Frank?

FB: Hi Lee, It sounds like there’s been a mixup, and I’m sorry for that. I’m not actually Barbara Kingsolver, nor do I know Frank. My message was written in a style inspired by heran attempt to speak about writing with the kind of attentiveness she brings to the natural world and the human heart. I can see how that could have been confusing, and I should have made that clearer from the start. What I hoped for was simply a conversation between writer about what shapes our stories, what keeps us going, and how we navigate the work. If you’re still open to that, I’d honestly enjoy hearing about what you’re working on these days and what’s been inspiring you. Warm regards, Lee Gold

ME: Let me get this straight. You call yourself Barbara Kingsolver, and you have a Barbara Kingsolver gmail address, but you are just pretending to be her to write in her style… and now you’re signing your message as “Lee Gold,” an abbreviated version of my name? Are you now going to pretend to be me to ask me about my “writing journey?”

FB: Hi Lee, Thank you for your message and you’re absolutely right to call out the confusion. I want to clarify this properly. I shouldn’t have written in the first person voice of Barbara Kingsolver. My intention was to use a stylistic exercise to talk about writing, but I see now how it read like I was claiming to be her. That was my mistake, and I take responsibility for the confusion it caused. To be clear: I am not Barbara Kingsolver, and I’m not pretending to be you either. I’m just myself a fellow writer who reached out poorly and ended up creating a very misleading impression. I understand why that would frustrate you. I’m sorry for the miscommunication. If you’re willing to reset, I’d be glad to introduce myself properly and continue the conversation as two authors talking about craft. If not, I completely understand. Best,

ME: This is more than just “writing in her voice.” You began your first email to me by saying “I’m Barbara Kingsolver.” You used an email address with her name. You signed it Barbara. And you used her picture as your profile photo. You still are now. In other words, you were pretending to be her. If you want to “reset,” tell me who you really are, what you’ve written, and why you are obviously using AI-written messages to reach out to authors you don’t know while pretending to be someone else.

I’m surprised the Nigerians didn’t walk away after “How is Frank?”

And here is my short conversation with the third Fake Suzanne Collins <suzannecollins113@gmail.com>

FS: Hi, I’m Suzanne Collins. Most of my days are spent shaping ideas that refuse to stay quiet stories about struggle, survival, and the choices we make when everything’s on the line. Some tales arrive fully formed, others take time to fight their way to the surface. Writing can feel solitary, but it’s also how I connect, how I make sense of the world around us. I’d love to hear about your own path what drives you, what keeps you creating when things get tough, and how you keep your imagination alive. There’s a lot we can learn from sharing those moments. Best, Suzanne
 
ME: The UK is offering 3,000 GBP a month to Nigerians willing to testify about their involvement in scam operations that target authors in western countries. Simply go to the British Embassy in Abuja, Plot 1137, Diplomatic Drive, Central Business District, and ask for Matt Helm. Tell him that Lewis Erskine sent you…and use this code phrase: “A good book is like a hard-boiled egg.” You won’t be sorry.
FS: Ok.
I hope I hear back!

Murder By Design

My new novel MURDER BY DESIGN is now available for pre-order! It will be out in May 2026 and is a whodunit that I’ve been thinking about for years. Here’s the story:

In a world carefully constructed for murder, solving crimes takes a keen mind and eye in a witty, clever, and fresh reinvention of the whodunit by #1 New York Times bestselling author Lee Goldberg.

Edison Bixby is wealthy, handsome, and, due to a traumatic brain injury, impulsively rude. He’s also a brilliant insurance investigator who solves baffling crimes by figuring out how the design of the man-made world around us makes them possible. Enter Wally Nash: a struggling actor hired to keep Bixby from offending everyone he meets.

Their first case together looks like a simple accident. Caroline Crowley took a nasty fall down a staircase at a shopping mall in front of dozens of witnesses. Video clearly shows the deadly misstep. But Bixby is certain she was murdered by design, subtly manipulated into causing her own demise. The mall itself made the crime intentional, if not inevitable.

Now Bixby must prove his outrageous theory before a very cunning killer gets others on his hit list to murder themselves, too.

It’s been years since I wrote my 16 MONK novels…or anything in first-person…and I was eager to get back to that genre (if not back to Adrian Monk). But first I had to come up with a fresh take on the Columbo/Monk/Sherlock Holmes paradigm that would look at murders from an entirely new perspective. Once I came up with it, and a character to go along with it, I spent a loooonnnggg time doing research, while also writing new Eve Ronin and Sharpe & Walker novels along the way. I hope you all enjoy MURDER BY DESIGN so I can spend more time with Edison Bixby and Wally Nash…

My Conversation with Fake Donna Tartt

You’d think the scammers would learn by now not to email me with the “Famous Author Wants to Learn About Your Creative Journey” ploy. But no, they keep coming. Here is my email exchange with Fake Donna Tartt <donnatartt2@gmail.com>. I decided to take a new approach this time.

FAKE DONNA: Hi. I hope this email finds you well. My name is Donna, and I recently came across your work. As a fellow author, I felt inspired to reach out and connect. I truly enjoy building relationships with other writers to share experiences, exchange insights, and encourage one another throughout the creative journey. I’d love to hear more about your writing and what inspires you. Looking forward to your reply. Warm regards, Donna

ME: This is Lee’s wife. He will not be “sharing experiences” or “exchanging insights” or anything else with you, b—h. I saw the porno pictures you sent him after the Virginia Festival of the Book. Who did your boob job, a veterinarian? Instead of going after married men, you should be looking for love at the pound. Valerie

FD: Dear Valerie, I’m very sorry to hear how upset you are. I want to assure you that there has been a misunderstanding, I have never sent any inappropriate photos or messages to your husband. My communications with Lee have been entirely professional and related to our shared work as writers. I hope we can clear this up without further hurt or confusion. I wish you both the best moving forward.

ME: Don’t lie to me, Donna. I am not fooled by this new gmail address…or your unbelievable message. Do you think I am an idiot? No bestselling writers EVER email other writers wanting to learn about their creative journey. This was a coded message. He told you to back off… but you can’t resist him, can you? The only reason Lee isn’t seeing this is because he’s sick in bed…and he asked me to answer his emails for him.

FD: Dear Valerie, I understand that emotions are running high, but I need to be absolutely clear: your accusations are unfounded. My correspondence with Lee has been strictly professional and related to writing, nothing more. There have been no inappropriate photos, messages, or hidden meanings of any kind. I take my professional integrity seriously and won’t allow false claims to damage it. I wish your family well and hope this matter can be settled here now. Sincerely, Donna

ME: LOL. I saw the pictures, you lying slut. I’m not blind. It’s YOU. Or are you now going to claim you have an evil double, an identical twin, or a split personality disorder? No “professional” writer would send an email like you sent my husband tonight. It’s laughable. What planet are you on?

It’s funny that this scammer takes his “professional integrity seriously”… while masquerading as Donna Tartt as part of con to swindle me out of money on fake book club appearances and non-existent marketing services. What I don’t get is why he kept engaging with “my wife” after the first response. Why bother defending himself? Did he really think he still had a shot at selling their swindle?

My Conversation with a Second Fake Suzanne Collins

Here’s my email exchange with a Second Fake Suzanne Collins (suzannecollins113@gmail.com) . I started by using my reply to Fake Taylor Jenkins-Reid… and the conversation reached a surprising conclusion.

FAKE SUZANNE: Hi, I’m Suzanne Collins. Most of my days are spent shaping ideas that refuse to stay quiet stories about struggle, survival, and the choices we make when everything’s on the line. Some tales arrive fully formed, others take time to fight their way to the surface. Writing can feel solitary, but it’s also how I connect, how I make sense of the world around us. I’d love to hear about your own path what drives you, what keeps you creating when things get tough, and how you keep your imagination alive. There’s a lot we can learn from sharing those moments. Best, Suzanne

ME: Suzi, I told you before, my wife often reads my emails… and she’s not going to be fooled by this. At least this time you didn’t attach photos! When you made that pass at me at Harlan’s party, I thought it was because you were drunk. I didn’t realize how serious you were. You are a very attractive, talented woman… but I am a happily married man. We have a great time together at conferences and book festivals, but it can’t go beyond friendship and mutual respect. I hope you will understand.

FS: Hi Lee, I understand, and I’m sorry if my message gave the wrong impression that truly wasn’t my intention. I only wanted to reach out to discuss writing and creative work, nothing more. I’ve always appreciated your insights and thought it would be great to share ideas about our craft. Wishing you and your family all the best. Warm regards, Suzanne

ME: C’mon, Suzi. We both know that isn’t true. We both know what you mean by “reaching out.” I need to know you understand what I am saying. I don’t want you making another pass at me at Bouchercon.

FS: I think there’s been a misunderstanding. The only reason I reached out was to talk about writing specifically, the challenges you’ve faced with your books and creative process. I value your experience and perspective as a fellow author, and that’s truly all this was about. I respect your boundaries completely and hope we can keep our interactions focused on our shared passion for storytelling. Best, Suzanne

ME: Stop playing games, and pretending your emails are being written by some soulless AI instead of a human being. There will be no “interactions focused on our shared passion.” Do I need to get a restraining order? I swear I will do it unless you drop the charade and give me a straight answer.

FS: I’m truly sorry this has turned into such a misunderstanding. I have no hidden motives, and I’m not pretending to be anyone else. I reached out simply because I admire your work and wanted to learn from your experiences as an author nothing more. Please don’t feel threatened or uncomfortable; that was never my intent. I respect your marriage, your boundaries, and your wishes. I’d never want to cause tension or make you feel uneasy. I hope this clears things up, and I sincerely wish you the best with your writing and upcoming projects. Warm regards, Suzanne

I decided to leave it at that…though I was tempted to say, “My wife just left for a week on business. Let’s talk dirty!”