Today I received this email, which I’m assuming is in response to my post "iUniverse By The Numbers."
Is it bad writing that prevents a POD book from selling or many other factors? I challenge you: an established, tradional, successful writer to submit something you wrote to a POD and when it doesn’t sell
will it be because of bad writing?Additionally, everyone allows for the fact even a POD publisher is going to have 2-3 successful books per year. Well, when you consider there are at least 100 POD outfits that means they are publishing 300 books per year that are worthy of being published. The problem is not with the concept of POD. The problem is there are too many PODs with limited ethical and quality standards. Imagine if there was one POD publisher that alone printed the previously mentioned 300 books.
I wonder a hundred years from now, will the reviewers of history look upon the likes of Monk and Dick Van Dyke as highly as you view your works.
Furthermore, how many bad books gain success simply because of the stature of the author (Clinton,Fisher,Grisham) and the correct marketing plan. Correctly done, a book with 200 completely blank pages could become a top seller.I think we both agree one of us is living in a Dream
World. We simply disagree on who it is.Sincerely,
John S. Meade
I’m not sure why John is so angry with me. I guess the story told by the iUniverse stats was a very rude awakening for him. Let’s tackle his points one by one: