From the Associated Press:
Basking in the jurors’ decision to acquit his client of all counts, Michael
Jackson’s lawyer said Tuesday the singer will no longer share his bed with young
boys.”He’s not going to do that anymore,” attorney Thomas
Mesereau Jr. told NBC’s ”Today.” ”He’s not going to make himself vulnerable
to this anymore.”
Himself vulnerable? What about the young boys? I still wonder what kind of parent would let their little children spend the night in bed with Michael Jackson. Bizarro.
“I still wonder what kind of parent would let their little children spend the night in bed with Michael Jackson.”
Goldigging con artists out to make a buck, which is how the jury saw the kid’s mother.
Lee, concerning the article you read and now cannot find. Did you check the history file on your computer. Sometimes this has saved me.
Sincerely,
John S. Meade
If Gavin and Janet Arviso had been more credible, the verdict would have certainly been different, but the fact is, they came off looking like gold digging, lying psychopaths.
The jury really had no choice but to acquit, there was more than reasonable doubt in this case.
The Tom Sneddon interview, after the verdict, made me grin a little bit. What an idiot. Talk about egg all over his face.
If he’d been a little more circumspect at the beginning of the trial, the conspiracy theories would have been blown out of the water, yet he lent weight to the rumours by acting like a smug bastard.
Talk about career suicide. I’m expecting reports of his resignation in the days to come.
”He’s not going to do that anymore,” attorney Thomas Mesereau Jr. told NBC’s ”Today.” ”He’s not going to make himself vulnerable to this anymore.”
AHH! My head! Too. Many. Jokes. Can’t. Pick One.
Hi Lee!
I came across your blog while I was googling for Seth Greenland. I’m a young, published writer who just started my own writing blog (http://www.justinrzb.com) and have a more recreational blog I’ve been using for five years, Change at Jamaica (http://bluepose.livejournal.com).
Are you interested in doing reciprocal links?
I’ll be reading you from here on it for sure!
-J
It’s tragic not only that it is virtually impossible to convict a famous person with a crime but that these “hot shot” lawyers are unavailable to impoverished people who may actually be wrongfully accused.
The point surely that the prosecution do not have to prove that MJ is a bad man who did bad things. Or even a madman who did stupid things.
They have to produce evidence sufficient to convince a jury that this person did the crime of which he has been accused. If they failed to do that, then obviously they had no alternative but to find him not guilty. Which is what happened.